Linking Incoterm Selection and Human Resource Competence for Enhancing Competitive Advantage: Evidence from Freight Forwarders Companies in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v6i5.5513Keywords:
Incoterms Selection, Human Resource Competence, Competitive Advantage, Freight Forwarding, IndonesiaAbstract
The freight forwarding sector holds a pivotal role in facilitating international trade by coordinating cross-border goods movement and integrating diverse logistics functions. Strategic choices and organizational capabilities are critical in enabling firms to sustain competitiveness. Within this context, Incoterm selection combined with workforce competence is recognized as a central determinant of competitiveness. Accordingly, this study investigates the interplay between Incoterm decisions and human resource proficiency in strengthening the competitive advantage of Indonesian freight forwarding companies. Adopting a quantitative design, data were gathered from freight forwarders and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess the proposed relationships. The findings reveal that both Incoterm selection and human resource competence have significant and positive influences on competitive advantage. Moreover, results suggest that competitive advantage is reinforced through the alignment of Incoterm choices with risk management, transportation modes, and negotiation capacity, while concurrently developing personnel skilled in customs procedures, global logistics systems, and intercultural communication. This research contributes to logistics and supply chain management literature by integrating contractual decision-making perspectives with resource-based theory. The study provides practical insights for freight forwarders in enhancing their market position within the global trade environment.
References
Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 7–35.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bergami, R., & Tichá, L. (2022). Managing Incoterms® 2020 export risks. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 23(2), 255–273.
Bharadwaj, S. G., Varadarajan, P. R., & Fahy, J. (1993). Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: a conceptual model and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 83–99.
Davis, J., & Vogt, J. (2021). Hidden supply chain risk and incoterms®: analysis and mitigation strategies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 619.
Davis, J., & Vogt, J. (2022). Incoterms® 2020 and the missed opportunities for the next version. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(9), 1263–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1897974
Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 1–20.
del Rosal, I. (2013). Delivery terms in international trade: Some evidence for Spain. Applied Economics Letters, 20(6), 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.725924
Edet, L., Ogbulogo, C., & Chiluwa, I. (2021). Aspects of semantics in global business: The nigerian example in the knowledge era. IBIMA Business Review, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5171/2021.866939
Ferreira, J., Cardim, S., & Coelho, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and mediating effects of innovation on the competitive advantage and firm’s performance: The moderating role of organizational learning capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 620–644.
Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004
Fruscione, A. (2022). The Court of Justice of the European Union Clarifies the Relationship Between Customs Value and Delivery Costs of Goods. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 17(1), 49–52.
Gardner, B. D. L. (2012). How to Use International Trade Terms for Competitive Advantage & Financial Gain (Issue Icc).
Gruchmann, T., Pratt, N., Eiten, J., & Melkonyan, A. (2020). 4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub. Logistics, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics4020010
Gupta, A., Singh, R. K., & Gupta, S. (2022). Developing human resource for the digitization of logistics operations: readiness index framework. International Journal of Manpower, 43(2), 355–379.
Hair, J. F. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). sage.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition PDF eBook. Pearson Higher Ed.
Hien, N., Laporte, G., & Roy, J. (2014). Business Environment Factors, Incoterms Selection and Export Performance. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2(2), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm040017
Jeon, S.-H. (2021). An analysis of delivery/transport documents content in relation to the contract of carriage under incoterms 2020 rules*. Journal of Korea Trade, 25(1), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2021.25.1.203
Kim, J.-H., Jeon, S.-H., Yang, J.-H., Davis, J., Vogt, J., Bergami, R., Tichá, L., Kim, S. M., Kubáňová, J., Otáhalová, Z., Senko, Š., Baena-Rojas, J. J., Cano, J. A., Tellarini, G., Petrová, M., Krügerová, M., & Kozieł, M. (2022). The Comparative Study of Incoterms 2020 and 2010 in International Physical Distribution. Journal of Korea Trade, 25(1), 1263–1286. https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v9i2.291
Kim, S. M. (2022). Some Critical & Controversial Issues on Incoterms 2020 for International Trade. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 17(1).
Kohlhase, S., & Wielhouwer, J. L. (2022). Tax and tariff planning through transfer prices: The role of the head office and business unit. Journal of Accounting and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101568
Lemoine, W., & Dagnæs, L. (2003). Globalisation strategies and business organisation of a network of logistics service providers. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030310471961
McKinnon, A. (2014). The possible influence of the shipper on carbon emissions from deep-sea container supply chains: An empirical analysis. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2013.25
Nugymanova, G., Nurgaliyeva, M., Zhanbirov, Z., Naumov, V., & Taran, I. (2021). Choosing a servicing company’s strategy while interacting with freight owners at the road transport market. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 1, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-1/204
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage, New York Free Press. PorterCompetitive Advantage1985.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations The Free Press. New York, 564.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Simons, 56–68.
Sanchez-Rodrigues, V., Potter, A., & Naim, M. M. (2010). The impact of logistics uncertainty on sustainable transport operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 40(1–2), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031011018046
Shou, Y., Li, Y., Park, Y. W., & Kang, M. (2017). The impact of product complexity and variety on supply chain integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(4), 297–317.
Shou, Y., Shao, J., & Chen, A. (2017). Relational resources and performance of Chinese third-party logistics providers: The mediating role of innovation capability. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 47(9), 864–883. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-09-2016-0271
Sink, H. L., Langley Jr, C. J., & Gibson, B. J. (1996). Buyer observations of the US third‐party logistics market. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 26(3), 38–46.
Stojanović, Ð., Ivetić, J., & Veličković, M. (2021). Assessment of international trade-related transport CO2 emissions—a logistics responsibility perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031138
Sugiono, A., Rahayu, A., & Wibowo, L. A. (2022). Environmental uncertainty factor, incoterm and implication for a strategic alliance in freight forwarder companies case study in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Logistics Management, 1(1), 1–15.
Sugiono, A., Rahayu, A., Wibowo, L. A., & Hurriyati, R. (2023). Analysis of Incoterms and Relational Resources to Improve Competitive Advantage: A Study of Freight Forwarders Company in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Logistics Management, 2(2), 64–91.
Sugiono, A., Rahayu, A., Wibowo, L. A., & Hurriyati, R. (2024). Uncertain Supply Chain Management.
The International Chamber of Commerce. (2020). ICC Rules for the Use of Domestic and International Trade Terms (723E ed.). International Chamber and Commerce Indonesia.
Wagner, O. (2022). The COVID-19 Pandemics’ Impact on Customs Valuation and Import Duties: An Israel Perspective, and a Wider Comparison. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 17(3), 113–120.
Wang, X., Kopfer, H., & Gendreau, M. (2014). Operational transportation planning of freight forwarding companies in horizontal coalitions. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(3), 1133–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.056
Yang, J.-H. (2021). A study on the reasonable choice and utilization of incoterms 2020 rules from the perspective of logistics and supply chain management. Journal of Korea Trade, 25(1), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2021.25.1.152
Zhang, B., & Mohammad, J. (2024). The effects of sustainability innovation and supply chain resilience on sustainability performance: Evidence from China’s cold chain logistics industry. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2353222.
Zhang, J., Jehangir, F. N., Yang, L., Tahir, M. A., & Tabasum, S. (2024). Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance: The Role of Organizational Culture, Organizational Innovation, and Knowledge Sharing. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01910-3
Zimmermann, R., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., & Moreira, A. C. (2020). An empirical analysis of the relationship between supply chain strategies, product characteristics, environmental uncertainty and performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(3), 375–391.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Sugiono, Agus Rahayu, Lili Adi Wibowo, Ratih Hurriyati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA).
