Technical Efficiency of Digital and Non-Digital Banks in Indonesia: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach for the 2024–2025 Period

Authors

  • Tia Ichwani Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Chaerani Nisa Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Murtada Sinuraya Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Deni Achmad Saputra Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v6i6.5870

Keywords:

Bank Efficiency, DEA, Digitalization, Bank Size, Credit Risk

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the efficiency of digital and conventional banks in Indonesia using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method and examine the effects of bank size, digitalization, and credit risk on efficiency. The data covers eight digital banks and eight conventional banks during the 2024–2025 period, with input variables: labor costs, total assets, and operational costs; and output variables: interest income, third-party funds (TPF), and total disbursed credit. The analysis results show that digital banks have a higher average efficiency level (0.91) than conventional banks (0.83). Bank size has a significant positive effect on efficiency, while digitalization and credit risk (NPL) have a negative effect. These findings emphasize the importance of business scale and risk management in maintaining banking efficiency in the digital era.

References

Akbar, R. A. (2009). Analisis Efisiensi Baitul Maal wa Tamwil dengan Menggunakan Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) (Studi pada BMT Bina Ummat Sejahtera di Jawa Tengah pada Tahun 2009).

Anderloni, L., & Bongini, P. (2009). Is financial innovation still a relevant issue? In L. Anderloni, D. T. Llewellyn & R. H. Schmidt (Eds.), Financial Innovation in Retail and Corporate Banking. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Berger, A. N., & Deyoung, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. 21, 849–870.

Charnes, A. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. 2, 429–444.

Kusumastuti, S. Y., Ekonomi, F., & Trisakti, U. (2008). DERAJAT PERSAINGAN INDUSTRI PERBANKAN INDONESIA : 23(1), 29–42.

Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of Digital Finance on Financial Inclusion and Stability. Borsa Istanbul Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003

Prayudya, D. R., Ikhwan, I., Nugroho, T., & Ramdiania, R. G. N. (2023). Debunking the myth of digital banking: Is it really that efficient? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4447063

Prayudya, D. R., Ikhwan, I., Nugroho, T., & Ramdiania, R. G. N. (2025). Comparing Neo and Traditional Banking Efficiency: A Three Stage DEA Analysis in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia SSRN.

Rivai, A. (2022). The effect of digital banking technology on bank efficiency and employee demand in the Indonesian banking industry. NVEO Journal, 11(4), 2189–2199.

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

Ichwani, T., Nisa, C., Sinuraya, M., & Saputra, D. A. (2025). Technical Efficiency of Digital and Non-Digital Banks in Indonesia: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach for the 2024–2025 Period. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 6(6), 5559–5566. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v6i6.5870

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.