The Relationship Between The Energy Mix Used in Bitcoin Mining and The Market Performance of Bitcoin as a Financial Asset: Market Return, Price Volatility, and GHG Emissions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i5.7118Keywords:
Bitcoin, Energy Consumption, Market, IndonesiaAbstract
Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work mechanism is energy intensive, exceeding the electricity consumption of a medium-sized country. As the adoption accelerates, it become a concern. Most studies analyzed its energy consumption, emissions, and price in isolation. This study examines the relationship between the energy consumption and energy mix of Bitcoin and its market performance, moderated by quality of regulation, using a time-series of secondary data from reputable resources e.g. Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index,, the Worldwide Governance Indicators, etc. Regression analyses are employed to test the hypotheses. Eight of nine null hypotheses failed to reject. However, energy consumption was found to have a significant positive relationship with market return. It is, however, likely that this finding captures shared underlying drivers of Bitcoin’s price and its energy consumption, as well as possible reverse causality. Energy mix was found to have no significant effect on the three alternative outcomes, aligned with the fungibility of Bitcoin. Furthermore, regulatory was found not to significantly moderate also likely due to the narrow variation in the Indonesia’s scores during the study period. The study identified that markets do not reward sustainable mining with a market premium, implying that the transition towards renewable-powered mining in Indonesia requires more policy intervention.
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
Auer, R., & Tercero-Lucas, D. (2022). Distributed ledger technologies and climate policy (BIS Working Papers No. 996). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/work996.htm
Bastian-Pinto, C. L., Araujo, F. V. de S., Brandão, L. E., & Gomes, L. L. (2021). Hedging renewable energy investments with Bitcoin mining. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138, 110520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110520
Baur, D. G., Hong, K., & Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative asset? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.004
Bendiksen, C., & Gibbons, S. (2019). The Bitcoin mining network: Trends in energy efficiency and hash rate. CoinShares Research.
Biais, B., Bisière, C., Bouvard, M., & Casamatta, C. (2019). The blockchain folk theorem. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1662–1715. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz017
Blau, B. M. (2017). Price dynamics and speculation in Bitcoin. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.05.010
Bruna, A. (2023). Distribution of Bitcoin mining's carbon footprint worldwide by region. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1087192/
Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. (2023). Bitcoin electricity consumption index (CBECI). https://cbeci.org
Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. (2025). Sustainable energy use rising in Bitcoin mining to 52.4%. Cambridge Judge Business School News. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk
Corbet, S., Meegan, A., Larkin, C., Lucey, B., & Yarovaya, L. (2021). Cryptocurrency energy consumption: Asset or liability for climate policy? Energy Economics, 104, 105627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105627
Cornell University. (2023). Bitcoin could support renewable energy development. Cornell Chronicle. https://news.cornell.edu
De Vries, A. (2018). Bitcoin's growing energy problem. Joule, 2(5), 801–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.016
Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016). Bitcoin, gold and the dollar – A GARCH volatility analysis. Finance Research Letters, 16, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.10.008
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone. [+]
Gallersdörfer, U., Klaaßen, L., & Stoll, C. (2020). Energy consumption of cryptocurrencies beyond Bitcoin. Joule, 4(9), 1843–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.013
Gandal, N., Hamrick, J. T., Moore, T., & Oberman, T. (2018). Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Journal of Monetary Economics, 95, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.12.004
Gans, J. (2023). The case for carbon pricing in digital currencies. Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/jep
Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
Gkillas, K., Katsiampa, P., Konstantatos, C., & Tsagkanos, A. (2022). Discontinuous movements and asymmetries in cryptocurrency markets. The European Journal of Finance, 30(16), 1907–1931.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hileman, G., & Rauchs, M. (2017). Global cryptocurrency benchmarking study. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2965436
Hossain, M. I., & Steigner, T. (2024). Balancing innovation and sustainability: Environmental impact of Bitcoin mining [SSRN working paper].
Ibáñez, J. I., & Freier, A. (2023). Bitcoin's carbon footprint revisited: Proof-of-work mining for renewable energy expansion. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.04578
Jones, B. A., Goodkind, A. L., & Berrens, R. P. (2022). Economic estimation of Bitcoin mining's climate damages. Scientific Reports, 12, 14512. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18686-8
Kabaklarlı, E. (2022). Green FinTech: Sustainability of Bitcoin. Digital Finance, 4(1), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-022-00053-x
Kohli, V., Chakravarty, S., Chamola, V., Sangwan, K. S., & Zeadally, S. (2022). Energy consumption and carbon footprint of cryptocurrencies. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.03717
Kölbel, J. F., & Heeb, F. (2023). Environmental and social risks from digital assets. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2072031
Koutmos, D. (2018). Bitcoin returns and transaction activity. Economics Letters, 167, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.03.021
Krause, M. J., & Tolaymat, T. (2018). Quantification of energy and carbon costs for mining cryptocurrencies. Nature Sustainability, 1(11), 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0152-7
Lahmiri, S., & Bekiros, S. (2021). Chaos and predictability of Bitcoin. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 151, 111247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111247
Lemmke, A. (2022). Bitcoin environmental impacts: Narrative literature review [Bachelor's thesis, Tampere University of Applied Sciences].
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Radulescu, M., et al. (2025). Environmental effects of Bitcoin mining on energy and water use. Scientific Reports, 15, 8230.
Sapra, N., Shaikh, I., Roubaud, D., Asadi, M., & Grebinevych, O. (2024). Uncovering Bitcoin's electricity consumption relationships with volatility and price: Environmental repercussions. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120528
Schinckus, C. (2021). Proof-of-work based blockchain technology and Anthropocene: An undermined situation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121189
Sedlmeir, J., Buhl, H. U., Fridgen, G., & Keller, R. (2020). The energy consumption of blockchain technology: Beyond myth. Energy Research & Social Science, 69, 101614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101614
Sial, N. R. (2025). Assessing the environmental footprint of Bitcoin. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c00225
Stoll, C., Klaaßen, L., & Gallersdörfer, U. (2019). The carbon footprint of Bitcoin. Joule, 3(7), 1647–1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.012
Tietenberg, T. H., & Lewis, L. (2018). Environmental & natural resource economics (11th ed.). Routledge.
Truby, J. (2021). Regulating Bitcoin for sustainable development [confirm exact title]. Energy Policy, 156, 112117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112117
Truby, J., Brown, D. R., Dahdal, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2022). Blockchain, climate damage, and death. Energy Research & Social Science, 88, 102499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102499
United Nations University. (2023). Hidden environmental impacts of Bitcoin. https://unu.edu/stories/bitcoin-environmental-impacts.html
Wang, Y., Lucey, B., Vigne, S. A., & Yarovaya, L. (2022). The Index of Cryptocurrency Environmental Attention (ICEA). China Finance Review International, 12(3), 378–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-09-2021-0191
Yarovaya, L., et al. (2021). Cryptocurrencies as a hedge or safe haven [confirm title]. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 30, 100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100497
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Herti Kirana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).
