The Influence of System Quality on User Satisfaction of the Regional Government E-Procurement System

Authors

  • Milde Wahyu Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Open University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i6.7390

Keywords:

System Quality, User Satisfaction, E-Procurement, Local Government, Information Systems Success

Abstract

Digital transformation in public procurement has expanded the use of electronic procurement systems to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency. However, empirical evidence on how system quality shapes user satisfaction in Indonesian local governments remains limited, particularly across multiple regions. This study examines the influence of system quality on user satisfaction using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected from 300 local government officials selected through purposive sampling and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, followed by qualitative interviews to explain the statistical findings. System quality was assessed through ease of use, reliability, response time, security, flexibility, integration, and accessibility. The results show that system quality has a positive and significant effect on user satisfaction (β = 0.723; t = 18.534; p < 0.001), explaining 52.3% of its variance. Qualitative findings reinforce the importance of reliability, usability, speed, security, and integration. The study extends the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model to multi-regional local government e-procurement and provides practical priorities for improving public digital procurement services.

References

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Rana, N. P., Slade, E. L., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO/IEC 25010: Systems and software engineering—Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)—System and software quality models.

International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023). IFRS S1: General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. IFRS Foundation

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.https://doi.org/10.2307/258792

McKnight, D.H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J.B., & Clay, P.F. (2011). Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2(2), 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353

Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263.

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS GmbH.

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2020). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 26(4), 531–554.

Seddon, P.B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253.

Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 233–244.

Thong, J.Y.L., Hong, W., & Tam, K.Y. (2006). The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 799–810.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.

Wang, Y.-S., & Liao, Y.-W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717–733.

Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557–1576.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-29

How to Cite

Wahyu, M. (2026). The Influence of System Quality on User Satisfaction of the Regional Government E-Procurement System. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 7(6), 5848–5854. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i6.7390