Women’s Agency in Community-Based Agriculture: A Systematic Review of Women Farmers’ Groups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i4.6435Keywords:
Women’s agency, women farmers’ groups, community-based agriculture, women’s empowermenAbstract
This article examines women’s agency in community-based agriculture, focusing on Women Farmers’ Groups (Kelompok Wanita Tani). The study explores how agency is conceptualised, enabled, and constrained within these collectives, clearly distinguishing it from mere participation and outcome-based measures of empowerment. A Systematic Literature Review of 31 peer-reviewed articles published since 2010 was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. By applying qualitative thematic synthesis, the findings reveal four interrelated themes. First, agency is a multidimensional and process-oriented construct that encompasses decision-making power, resource control, and autonomy, though it has varying levels of conceptual clarity. Second, collective action, participatory governance, and capacity-building act as highly context-dependent enabling mechanisms. Third, institutional support is critical but carries the risk of creating program-dependent empowerment through top-down interventions. Fourth, persistent structural constraints such as gender norms, unequal resource control, and time poverty continue to limit autonomy despite active participation. Ultimately, these organizations only foster transformative empowerment when conditions permit meaningful decision-making and control over agricultural practices. This review contributes by clarifying the conceptual boundaries between participation, empowerment outcomes, and women’s agency, providing a process-oriented understanding of how this agency is negotiated.
References
Booth, A. (2016). Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: A structured methodological review. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021a). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021b). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Bryan, E., Ringler, C., & Meinzen-dick, R. (2017). Gender , Resilience , and Food Systems. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23535-1
Carnahan, S., Agarwal, R., & Campbell, B. (2010). The Effect of Firm Compensation Structures on the Mobility and Entrepreneurship of Extreme Performers. Business, 920(October), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj
Doss, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., & Theis, S. (2018). Women in agriculture: Four myths. Global Food Security, 16(July), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.10.001
Farnworth, C. R., Bharati, P., Krishna, V. V., Roeven, L., & Badstue, L. (2022). Caste-gender intersectionalities in wheat-growing communities in Madhya Pradesh, India. Gender, Technology and Development, 26(1), 28–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2034096
Farnworth, C. R., Jafry, T., Bharati, P., Badstue, L., & Yadav, A. (2021). From Working in the Fields to Taking Control. Towards a Typology of Women’s Decision-Making in Wheat in India. European Journal of Development Research, 33(3), 526–552. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00281-0
Farnworth, C. R., Jafry, T., Lama, K., Nepali, S. C., & Badstue, L. B. (2019). From Working in the Wheat Field to Managing Wheat: Women Innovators in Nepal. European Journal of Development Research, 31(2), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0153-4
Gonzalez Parrao, C., Shisler, S., Moratti, M., Yavuz, C., Acharya, A., Eyers, J., & Snilstveit, B. (2021). Aquaculture for improving productivity, income, nutrition and women’s empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1195
Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48(4), 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91, 100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315
Lorenc, T., Khouja, C., Harden, M., Fulbright, H., & Thomas, J. (2024). Defensive healthcare practice: Systematic review of qualitative evidence. BMJ Open, 14(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085673
Lumpkin, G. T., Steier, L., & Wright, M. (2011). in Family Business Business and Strategic. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 306, 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
Malapit, H. J. (2017). The Abbreviated Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (A-WEAI). May, 1–56.
Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Doss, C., & Theis, S. (2019). Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: Framework and review of available evidence. Agricultural Systems, 172(June), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.009
Opola, F. O., Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C., & W. Kilelu, C. (2021). The Hybridity of Inclusive Innovation Narratives Between Theory and Practice: A Framing Analysis. European Journal of Development Research, 33(3), 626–648. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00290-z
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Petesch, P., & Prain, G. (2018). The GENNOVATE Methodology.
Rai, P., Swartz, H. J., Soni, N., Benson, J. C., Agarwal, A., Messina, S. A., Farnsworth, P. J., Carr, C. M., & Bathla, G. (2025). Neuroimaging Spectrum of Erdheim-Chester Disease: An Image-Based Review. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 46(7), 1300–1308. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8599
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(July), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Surma, N. (2023). Are international agriculture projects empowering rural female farmers in sub-Saharan Africa? A case study of North Central Nigeria. February, 1–350.
Wagle, U., Vollmer, F., UN DESA, Thorbecke, E., Sen, A., Santos, M. E., Lugo, M. A., Lopez-calva, L. F., Cruces, G., Battiston, D., Ravallion, M., Pisani, F., Weber, M., Paper, W., Mowafi, M., Measurement, B. P., Lanjouw, J. O., Laderchi, C. R., Ruhi, S., … Foster. (2010). OPHI W ORKING P APER N O . 32 Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. In Journal of Economic Inequality (Vol. 9, Issue 2). www.topics.developmentgateway.org/poverty
Wohlin, C., Kalinowski, M., Romero Felizardo, K., & Mendes, E. (2022). Successful combination of database search and snowballing for identification of primary studies in systematic literature studies. Information and Software Technology, 147(February), 106908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106908
Yang, H., Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2014). Functions and limitations of farmer cooperatives as innovation intermediaries: Findings from China. Agricultural Systems, 127, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.02.005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elin Herlina, Mustofa Kamil, Uyu Wahyudin, Yanti Shantini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).
