Determinants of Competitive Performance in the Indonesian Freight Forwarding Industry: Integration, Embeddedness, and Innovation

Authors

  • Ismail Rasyid Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Edi Abdurachman Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Marthaleina Ruminda Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ridho Bramulya Ikhsan Universitas Bina Nusantara, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i5.6674

Keywords:

Supply Chain Integration, Network Embeddedness, Innovation Performance, Competitiveness Performance, Freight Forwarding

Abstract

The global logistics industry is transforming operational functions into strategic capabilities to create competitive advantage. However, rapid market growth in Indonesia has not been fully matched by adequate organizational capabilities, leading to the "fragmented capability" phenomenon that hinders firm competitiveness. This study aims to analyze how supply chain integration, digital logistics, and network embeddedness simultaneously influence innovation performance and competitive performance in Indonesian freight forwarding companies. This study employs a quantitative explanatory research design involving 201 respondents in managerial positions, selected through purposive sampling. Data analysis was conducted using a Structural Equation Modeling approach based on Partial Least Squares. The research results show that supply chain integration and network embeddedness significantly improve innovation performance, and that network embeddedness and innovation performance directly enhance competitive performance. Conversely, supply chain integration has no significant direct influence on competitive performance, indicating that its role is more of a supporting capability that must be transformed through innovation. This study concludes that competitive advantage is determined not only by operational integration but by the organization's ability to convert those capabilities into valuable innovations. Companies are advised to prioritize strengthening innovation and strategic partnerships to increase access to market opportunities.

References

Andersen, P. H., Åberg, S., & Bujac, A. (2023). Corporate sustainable brand identity work and network embeddedness: Learnings from Better Place (2007–2013). Industrial Marketing Management, 115, 526-538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.10.014

Baah, C., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Acquah, I. S. K., & Essel, D. (2023). Government influence on logistics and supply chain innovations: assessing implications for firm performance and societal impact in an emerging economy. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(11), 3646-3666. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-09-2021-1348

Bai, L., Liu, X., Leng, X., Yao, Y., Yang, Y., Li, D., Zhao, Y., & Yin, H. (2025). Relational embeddedness, organizational learning ambidexterity, and competitive advantage in digital healthcare. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 33024.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Boxu, Y., Xingguang, L., & Kou, K. (2022). Research on the influence of network embeddedness on innovation performance: evidence from China's listed firms. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (JIK), 7(3), 1-12.

Duong, N. H., & Ha, Q.-A. (2021). The links between supply chain risk management practices, supply chain integration and supply chain performance in Southern Vietnam: A moderation effect of supply chain social sustainability. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1999556. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1999556

Ferreira, J., Cardim, S., & Coelho, A. (2021). Dynamic Capabilities and Mediating Effects of Innovation on the Competitive Advantage and Firm’s Performance: the Moderating Role of Organizational Learning Capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 620-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00655-z

Ganbold, O., Matsui, Y., & Rotaru, K. (2020). Effect of information technology-enabled supply chain integration on firm's operational performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(3), 948-989. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-10-2019-0332

GRR. (2024). Logistics Market (2024 - 2030) https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/logistics-market-report

Hair Jr, J. F. (2021). Next-generation prediction metrics for composite-based PLS-SEM. Industrial management & data systems, 121(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0505

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Hassan, N. M., Khan, S. A. R., Ashraf, M. U., & Sheikh, A. A. (2023). Interconnection between the role of blockchain technologies, supply chain integration, and circular economy: A case of small and medium-sized enterprises in Pakistan. Science Progress, 106(3), 00368504231186527. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504231186527

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

IMARC. (2025). Asia Pacific Logistics Market Size, Share, Trends and Forecast by Model Type, Transportation Mode, End Use, and Region, 2025-2033 https://www.imarcgroup.com/asia-pacific-logistics-market

Li, X., & Liu, X. (2023). The impact of the collaborative innovation network embeddedness on enterprise green innovation performance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1190697.

Lyu, T., Guo, Y., & Lin, H. (2022). Understanding green supply chain information integration on supply chain process ambidexterity: The mediator of dynamic ability and the moderator of leaders’ networking ability. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1088077.

Mailani, D., Hulu, M., Simamora, M., & Kesuma, S. (2024). Resource-Based View Theory to Achieve a Sustainable Competitive Advantage of the Firm: Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Studies, 4, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijeass.v4i1.2002

Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017). Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of business research, 70, 1-16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225

Padilla-Lozano, C. P., & Collazzo, P. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, green innovation and competitiveness – causality in manufacturing. Competitiveness Review, 32(7), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-12-2020-0160

Pomegbe, W. W. K., Li, W., Dogbe, C. S. K., & Otoo, C. O. A. (2020). Enhancing the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises through network embeddedness. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(3), 156.

Rahmasari, L. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Supply Chain Integration, Teknologi Informasi dan Inovasi Terhadap Keunggulan Bersaing Pada Perusahaan Freight Forwading. Jurnal Ilmiah Aset, 21(1), 33-38.

Rana, J., Daultani, Y., Goswami, M., & Kumar, S. (2025). Exploring the impact of supply chain digital transformation on supply chain performance: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(3), 3497-3521. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4157

Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189

Soniewicki, M., & Hauke-Lopes, A. (2025). Network Embeddedness and Company Competitiveness. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 65(3), 344-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2291535

Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Tian, H., Iqbal, S., Anwar, F., Akhtar, S., Khan, M. A. S., & Wang, W. (2021). Network embeddedness and innovation performance: a mediation moderation analysis using PLS-SEM. Business Process Management Journal, 27(5), 1590-1609.

Tian, S., Wu, L., Pia Ciano, M., Ardolino, M., & Pawar, K. S. (2024). Enhancing innovativeness and performance of the manufacturing supply chain through datafication: The role of resilience. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 188, 109841. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109841

Wang, M., Childerhouse, P., & Abareshi, A. (2024). Global logistics and supply chain integration in the digital era: a focus on China's Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 22(2), 58-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/jilt-03-2023-0018

Wasik, Z., Nugroho, K. C., & Suhermawan, D. (2023). The Performance of a National Logistics Company Measured by Dynamic Capabilities And Innovation Performance: Literature Review. Journal of Managerial Sciences and Studies, 1(1), 57-71.

Xing, X., Chen, T., Yang, X., & Liu, T. (2023). Digital transformation and innovation performance of China's manufacturers? A configurational approach. Technology in Society, 75, 102356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102356

Yildiz Çankaya, S., & Sezen, B. (2018). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-03-2018-0099

Yuswantoro, F., Oktaria, N., & Mujoko, H. (2022). Peran implementasi e-procurement dan inovasi supply chain terhadap kinerja supply chain industri pertahanan pada era digital. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 3(6), 7-16.

Zainurrafiqi, Z., & Gazali, G. (2024). Supply chain digitalization, green supply chain, supply chain resilience toward competitiveness and msmes performance. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 22(1), 175-192.

Zhou, J., & Mei, J. (2025). Supply chain integration and innovation performance of manufacturing firms: The moderating role of research and development investment intensity. Plos one, 20(2), e0316251.

Zu’bi, M., Tarawneh, E., Abdallah, A. B., & Fidawi, M. A. (2015). Investigating supply chain integration effects on environmental performance in the Jordanian food industry. American Journal of Operations Research, 5(4), 247-257.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

How to Cite

Rasyid, I., Abdurachman, E., Ruminda, M., & Ikhsan, R. B. (2026). Determinants of Competitive Performance in the Indonesian Freight Forwarding Industry: Integration, Embeddedness, and Innovation. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 7(5), 4244–4258. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i5.6674

Most read articles by the same author(s)